Hingherul Barbulescu Flavius imi cere daune morale de 100000 de euro!

Va vine sau nu sa credeti, hingherul cu cea mai bine cotata “onoare”, cu cea mai scumpa “demnitate” si cu cea mai “valoroasa” imagine din Europa vietuieste si vaneaza caini chiar in Brasov. El se numeste bineinteles Barbulescu Flavius Dumitru iar in februarie 2013 m-a dat in judecata cerandu-mi daune morale de 100000 de euro pentru ca i-as fi lezat “onoarea/demnitatea/imaginea”, descriind cu lux de amanunte “prolifica”-i activitatea profesionala.

Barbulescu

Barbulescu

 

  La evaluarea “onoarei, demnitatii si imaginii” proprii, Barbulescu a folosit probabil o formula de calcul simpla (des utilizata in practica hingheritului carpato-danubiano-pontic), conform careia numarul total de caini ucisi sau morti in adapostul lui imputit (35000) a fost inmultit cu numarul total de caini tratati medical si hraniti (3) pentru ca din suma obtinuta sa se scada apoi numarul de persoane care n-au mai putut dormi noaptea din cauza atrocitatilor la care a fost supuse animalele in aceeasi cocina de la Stupini (5000).

020813_01 Tueries en srie Stupini

    In actiunea introdusa la Judecatoria Brasov (dosarul cu nr. 4429/1972013) “onorabilul”, “respectabilul” si pe alocuri chiar “adorabilul” reclamant Barbulescu Flavius Dumitru se adreseaza instantei cu cateva cereri patetice mustind de “demnitate” lezata (citez):

  “sa binevoiti ca in baza probelor ce se vor administra”, prin sentinta ce o veti pronunta”: 1. sa-l obligati pe paratul Feher Codrut la plata de daune morale in suma de 100000 de euro reprezentand despagubiri pentru incalcarea dreptului meu la demnitate si a dreptului meu la propria imagine”; 2. Sa-l obligati pe parat sa indeparteze articolele si imaginile care aduc atingere onoarei reputatiei si imaginii subsemnatului, postate de parat pe site-ul www.animatime.ro; 3. Sa il obligati pe parat sa posteze pe internet hotararea judecatoreasca prin care este obligat la plata daunelor morale ce se va pronunta in prezenta cauza.

   In motivatia cererii, napastuitul hingher “explica” mai intai instantei ca, in cadrul serviciului de hingherit al Brasovului (unde ocupa functia de director) nu avea mai multa putere de decizie decat o femeie de serviciu (si prin urmare nu poate fi vinovat de niciuna din nenorocirile de care-l acuzam) pentru a continua, in aceeasi nota lacrimogen-mucilaginoasa (citez): ”Paratul (adica eu) activeaza in cadrul unor organizatii neguvernamentale pentru protectia animalelor. Depasind cadrul legal al actiunilor si manifestarilor ce privesc protectia animalelor, paratul a savarsit repetate atacuri grave la onoarea si la reputatia persoanei mele, cauzand grave prejudicii asupra persoanei mele si asupra imaginii mele (evident, nu atat de grave precum prejudiciile aduse sau dupa caz “cauzate asupra” limbii romane de catre reclamant si avocatul sau prin formularile tampe si agramate din plangere) ”cercetarile penale, declaratiile repetate la Politie si parchet, procesul penal in fata instantei de judecata si zecile de controale efectuate de toate institutiile sesizate, m-au supus unui stres puternic si indelungat, care mi-a afectat atat viata de familie cat si relatiile in societate (…) paratul a inceput o campanie indreptata impotriva onoarei si reputatiei mele, pentru a discredita imaginea mea publica si a ma supune dispretului public. Actiunile desfasurate de parat in cursul anului 2012 si in prezent au constat in ” :

  • Postarea pe internet a unor articole in care a proferat injurii, amenintari si calomnii, atacuri la persoana folosind un limbaj de jargon deosebit de agresiv.
  • Instigare la violenta impotriva mea (“sa-i goniti pe hingheri cu suturi in spate”);
  • Acuzatii neadevarate ca am chinuit (“am sufocat”, am lasat nemancati”) si ca am omorat 30000 de caini. Paratul a adaugat postarilor sale pe internet fotografii cu persoana mea fara a avea acordul meu, precum si fotografii prezentand caini tranchilizati si zeci de caini morti. Nu stiu unde si cand au fost facute acele fotografii. Ca reactie la instigarea publica exercitata de parat, subsemnatul am inceput sa primesc la domiciliu plicuri cu fotografii lipite pe exterior infatisand caini morti. Aceste fotografii au fost descarcate de pe site-ul pe care paratul a postat aceste fotografii. Tot ca reactie la postarile facute de parat, insultatoare, calomniatoare si care incita la violenta impotriva persoanei mele, comentariile facute de cititori sunt elocvente (…) Comentariile exprima ura si indemnuri la violenta imporiva persoanei mele (…) Finalul plangerii lui Barbulescu este de-a dreptul apoteotic (citez): “Toata aceasta campanie negativa si batjocoritoare la adresa demnitatii si imaginii persoanei mele a facut obiectul discutiilor intre prieteni, colegi si cunostintele mele.  Mi-a fost afectat dreptul la o imagine onesta in Municipiul Brasov dupa 21 de ani de activitate in slujba cetatenilor”.Inocent ca orice infractor nedovedit din tarisoara asta sufocata de infractori nedovediti, Barbulescu Flavius Dumitru indruga printre randuri o poveste cretina dar bucolica, o poveste cu iz boliwoodian “in baza” careia cerseste simpatie, empatie, compasiune si-un purcoi banuti nemunciti si nemeritati (”mana intinsa care nu spune o poveste, nu primeste de pomana” e leit-motivul escrocului din “Filantropica”). Povestea suna cam asa: Barbulescu, un functionar cinstit, cap de familie, cetatean si prieten onest si cu frica lui Dumnezeu, mare  iubitor de oameni, animale, natura, peisaje, cultura si dreptate care trudeste inca de pe bancile liceului in slujba brasovenilor exterminand caini, e atacat din senin si fara niciun motiv de-o bestie de ONG-ist care il batjocoreste, il reclama la toate institutiile statului, si-i intineaza  (pe internet) imaginea imaculata pe care brasovenii o poarta in suflete ca pe o icoana. Convins de inocenta lui corporala, spirituala, ontologica, bietul om suporta cu stoicism anchetele inchizitoriale ale autoritatilor “competente” conduse sau influentate de amicii sai ( Dorin Valter Enache de la DSVSA Brasov si Mircea Popa de al Politia Brasov) si se lasa flagelat de cca 7 poze cu caini morti (despre care “nu stie unde sunt facute”) pe care o mana “criminala”, “calomniatare”, “instigatoare”  i le aseaza in posta “in asa fel incat sa le vada tot cartierul”. Ideea ca i-a fost intinata cutia postala varandu-i-se in ea cateva poze cu caini morti il impiedica pe bietul om sa mai doarma linistit (asa cum reusea sa doarma dupa ce ordona uciderea “cainilor morti din poze”, in cutumia mizerabila de la Stupini) si-i taie pentru cca doua saptamani pofta de viata (ce viata e aia in care uciderea sau infometarea pana la moarte a unui caine nu-ti mai provoaca nicio satisfactie?). La doi ani de la postarea pe internet a textelor care i-au violat onoarea virginala si l-au supus suferintei “atroce” descrise mai sus, dupa ce autoritatile “competente” ii proclama public inocenta absoluta “victima” Barbulescu Flavius Dumitru se adreseaza respectuos, cuvincios si unsuros instantei civile, cerand repararea “prejudiciului”.Citita de un om sarac cu duhul si raportata la “brandul” nostru de tara care se pregateste de amnistia colectiva si de sorcovirea institutionala a infractorilor (cu ajutorul Noul Cod Penal si a altor legi la fel de nocive) povestea hingherului brasovean poate parea la fel de induiosatoare ca poveste fetitei cu chibrituri. In fond omul n-a violat, n-a talharit si nici n-a comis vreuna din celelalte 2 infractiuni la care anumiti procurori brasoveni au redus Codul Penal dupa ratacirea corespunzatoare a faptuitorului in ceata dintre “latura obiectiva” si “latura subiectiva”. Ori, in asemenea conditii, de ce n-ar poza un hingher in “mucenic” si de ce n-ar pretinde cu tupeu “hingherul mucenicit” daune morale de 2 ori mai mari decat cele pretinse de un detinut politic pentru 10 ani petrecuti la Canal?Citita de oameni seriosi, insa, plangerea “hingherului napastuit” aminteste de povestile mincinoase ale baronului Munchausen. Numai un mincinos patologic din stirpea lui Munchausen, ar fi putut sustine cu atata ingenuitate ca:
  •  Intr-o tara aflata sub calcaiul baronilor locali, “seful unui serviciu public (asa cum este Barbulescu) si pupilul unui baron local (Scripcaru) e “abuzat” fara motiv de-un ong-ist rau!
  •  Intr-o tara in care sefii taie si spanzura, hingherul-sef Barbulescu e inocent ca un  miel, NU era implicat in si NU stia nimic despre tratamentul mizerabil aplicat animalelor in cocina pe care o patrona (pesemne ca hingherii din subordine comiteau cruzimile pe sustache, pe urma isi protejau seful oferindu-i informatii si imagini trucate despre belsugul si bunastarea cainilor din adapost, repectiv-poze si filme din adaposturi de lux din Germania si Olanda);
  •  Intr-un oras in care seful politiei municipiului (Mircea Popa) si directorul DSVSA (Enache Dorin) se bat pe burta cu seful serviciului de hingherit al Primariei si tremura la umbra primarului, organele “competente” conduse de Mircea Popa si Enache Dorin Valter au controlat “corect” si “cu simt de raspundere” cocina hinghereasca a primariei (si n-au gasit evident nicio porcarie);
  •  In conditiile in care suferinta miilor de cainii care si-au gasit sfarsitul la Stupini nu i-a smuls nici macar un sughit, hingherul-sef s-a perpelit atins direct in hipotalamus de doua texte publicate pe internet si de 7 poze cu cainii omorati chiar din ordinul lui;
  • O instanta care zice ca faptele de care Barbulescu a fost acuzat nu se sanctioneaza penal ci contraventional, stabileste de fapt, in absolut, “nevinovatia” hingherului decretandu-l neintinat ca un jainist.Pentru cineva cu capul pe umeri, adevarul din spatele gogomaniilor hingherului-sef se impune cu forta evidentei. Astfel, daca pe Barbulescu l-a deranjat ceva la plangerile si textele mele, l-a deranjat adevarul lor. L-a deranjat ca-l demascam, lasandu-l in fundul gol ca pe imparatul din poveste si l-a scos din minti ca-i gatuiam afacerea cu cadavre de caini. Iar daca a “suferit”, asa cum sustine, atunci a facut-o din cauza sevrajului in care a intrat pentru ca nu mai putea sa toace caini, a suferit “relaxat”, jucandu-se de-a “Politia Animalelor”, militand alaturi de Scripcaru, Mihai Atanasoaie si Sulfina Barbu pentru casapirea tuturor cainilor, ranjind degajat si tachinand-o pe Cristina Lapis cu scheciuri cretine (de genul ”Ati auzit ca in noua lege, se pot omora cainii bolnavi, batrani si agresivi?” “Da, dar cu ceilalti ce vreti sa faceti d-le Barbulescu?” “Care ceilalti, doamna Cristina?” ). Pentru cineva care gandeste si nu rumega, este foarte clar ca:
  • In Romania niciun ong-ist n-ar putea face figura de organ de represiune hartuind un functionar public cinstit.
  •  Barbulescu stia si controla tot ce se petrece in hruba de la Stupini, era capul, nasul, finul, mama, tata si copilul tuturor rautatilor de acolo.
  • Organele statutului, adica politia si dsvsa au bagat sub pres porcariile hingheresti, sabotand constant aplicarea legii.
  • Barbulescu n-a suferit din cauza textelor nici cat ar suferi o oaie careia i se smulge un scaiete din coada.
  • Instanta n-a confirmat nevinovatia hingherului ci doar a decretat (impotriva unei bogate jurisprudente, a interpretarilor oficiale a ANSVSA si a logicii e bun-simt) ca cruzimile fata de animale de care il acuzam pe Barbulescu nu se sanctioneaza penal ci contraventional (iar contraventia , evident, s-a prescris).Iar daca se intreaba cineva care este mobilul acestei mascarade in care Barbulescu face figura de victima sacrificiala, asistat de-un avocat care-i vine ca o manusa sau ca un cioarap (si pe care-l recomandam cu caldura tuturor rumanilor care-au chinuit un caine sau o pisica si care, dupa ce-au scapat de procurori vor sa le interzica vecinilor sa-i arate cu degetul), raspunsul e cat se poate de simplu: In februarie 2013, cand sub presiunea noastra fara precedent DSV-ul a aplicat serviciului de hingherit sanctiuni contraventionale si a constatat “neconformitatile” (pe care pana atunci nu le putuse constata pentru ca inspectorul Vladila Constantin avea orbul gainior si albeata epizootica pe constiinta), Barbulescu s-a sfatuit cu Enache Dorin Valter (directorul DSVSA Brasov), si, pentru a sparge incercuirea, m-au dat amandoi in judecata intr-un tandem perfect ca doua partenere de inot sincron in ape tulburi si mocirloase.Pohta ce-o pohtesc cei doi ipochimeni prin aceasta miscare indrazneata este o “super-imunitate”. Incurajat de micile “imunitati” (la infractiuni) primite de la procurorii si de la instanta penala in vreo 3 dosare (la urma urmei, ar fi anormal ca procurorii romani sa condamne un hingher pentru ca a chinuit niste caini cand n-au fost in stare sa condamne pe nimeni pentru cei 1000 de morti ai Revolutiei!), Barbulescu indrazneste mai mult si cerseste instantei civile sa instituie cenzura in ceea ce priveste “nobela” lui persoana si sa bage pumnul in gura celor care descriu intr-o maniera realista porcariile pe care le-a comis. Drepturile de autor asupra “demnitatii, onoarei si imaginii” hingherului-sef ar urma sa revina in totalitate tarcovnicilor din aparatul de propaganda mediatica al Primariei iar respectivele “componente” ale personalitatii hingherului-sef ar urma sa fie “spalate” constiincios de trio-ul Dan Ghita, Daniel Giurma sau Vifor Rotar, exact asa cum e spalata o pereche de izmene murdare intr-o masina performanta, care dezvolta cel putin 2000 de rotatii pe minut.Vineri 24 ianuarie 2014 la Judecatoria Brasov, Sala J3, in jurul orelor 12 are loc audierea partilor si martorilor in procesul “istoric” in care Primul hingher din lume isi apara “onoarea” in fata actiunilor oneroase ale ong-urilor. Din partea reclamantului se va prezenta ca martor chiar capul “lezat” al DSV-ului, directorul Enache Dorin Valter, (care cu aceasi “salubritate” profesionala cu care a avizat ani de-a randul cocina insalubra de la Stupini, va aviza gogomaniile din plangerea hingherului-sef). Cu aceasta ocazie, publicul va afla intr-un cadru festiv, oficial ca “onorabilul” reclamant Barbulescu Flavius si “venerabilul” martor Enache Dorin Valter sunt urmariti penal in dosarul cu nr. 62/P/2012 al Parchetului de pe langa Judecatoria Gheorgheni pentru comiterea infractiunilor de “cruzime fata de animale, fals intelectual si neglijenta in serviciu (se va narui si unul din secretele lui Polichinelle si anume acela ca Barbulescu a Flavius a mintit cu nerusinare atunci cand a declarat ca toate denunturile noastre penale s-au finalizat cu traditionalul N.U.P.)  

 

http://portal.just.ro/197/SitePages/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=19700000000186286&id_inst=197

P.S.

  •   In ceea ce priveste “onoarea, demnitatea si imaginea” acestui Jean Jaques Rousseau al hingherilor (care prin plangerea sa vrea sa arate ca fiecare hingher se naste pur si omoara caini imaculat dar ong-urile “il corupe”) ea se reflecta fidel in imaginile si filmele de mai jos, care nu mai au nevoie de niciun comentariu

 

catei

 

090808 Killing station in Stupini-11

090808 Killing station in Stupini-2

 

 

Share
31 Responses to "Hingherul Barbulescu Flavius imi cere daune morale de 100000 de euro!"
  • Viktor 23/01/2014 la 9:51 am

    haideti sa ne facem un grup mare de oameni si sa cotonagim si sa batem cu bestialitate hingherii icnat sa numa aiba curaj sa faca vreodata ceva animalelor,ne mascam nu este deloc greu si batem si cei 2 3 politisti aflati cu ei,haideti sa aratam ca suntem barbati curajosi!

  • iulia 23/01/2014 la 11:08 am
  • Andra 23/01/2014 la 11:09 am

    ??? Sa ceara daune morale pt ce?! Sper sa plateasca pentru ce au facut!!!

  • borg 23/01/2014 la 11:38 am

    ii urez „d-lui” HINGHER barbulescu flaviu sa cunoasca justitia divina!!!

  • jutta utech 23/01/2014 la 1:50 pm

    das sind keine menschen das ist der teufel der soetwas macht ich wünsche den leuten alles schlechte was es auf der welt gibt und mögen sie jede nacht albtraume bis ans Lebensende haben die teufel pfui ich spucke aus

  • jutta utech 23/01/2014 la 1:52 pm

    hoffentlich ist der richter ok und schmeist den kläger raus

  • Angie savory 23/01/2014 la 2:49 pm

    approximate translation …. google

    Barbulescu

     

      In assessing the „honor, dignity and image” own Barbulescu probably used a simple formula (often used in practice hingheritului Carpathian-Danubian-Pontic), according to which the total number of dogs killed or died in the shelter’s smelly (35000) to was multiplied by the total number of dogs treated medically and fed (3) that the amount obtained then subtract the number of people who have not been able to sleep at night because of the atrocities that were subject to the same dump animals at Stupini ( 5000).

    020813_01 Tueries en you spell Stupini

        In appeal to Court of Brasov (file no. 4429/1972013) „honorable”, „respectable” and sometimes even „adorable” Barbulescu Flavius ​​Dumitru applicant addresses the court with several applications replete pathetic „dignity” injured (and I quote):

      „Was pleased that based on the evidence that will be given” by the sentence what you pronounce „1. I ordered the defendant to Feher Codrea pay damages in the amount of 100,000 euros in compensation for violating my right to dignity and my right to his own image „2. To force the defendant to remove articles and images affecting the reputation and honor of the image of the undersigned, the defendant posted on the website http://www.animatime.ro 3. Oblige the defendant to post on the internet judicial decision is liable to pay moral damages to be given in this case.

       The motivation demand oppressed dogcatcher „explain” the first court that, in the service of the pound of Brasov (where he holds the position of director) does not have more discretion than a cleaning woman (and therefore can not be guilty of any the misfortunes of which charges) to continue in the same grade tear-mucilaginous (quote): „Respondent (ie me) working in the animal welfare non-governmental organizations. Exceeding the legal framework of actions and events relating to animal welfare, the defendant committed several serious attacks on the honor and reputation of my person, causing serious damage on my person and on my picture (obviously not as serious as damage to or after the event ” caused the „Romanian language by the applicant and his lawyer Tampa and illiterate form of complaint)” criminal investigations, repeated statements to the police and parquet criminal proceedings in a court of law, and dozens of checks of all notified institutions, they subjected to high stress and long, so that affected my family life and relationships in society (…) the defendant began a campaign directed against my honor and reputation to discredit my public image and public contempt obey. Actions of the defendant in the course of 2012 and now consisted ”

        Internet posting of articles which uttered insults, threats and slander, personal attacks using a particularly aggressive jargon language.
        Inciting violence against me („to pound with sutures and drove the back”);
        I struggled untruthful accusations („I choked,” I left undernourished „) and that I killed 30,000 dogs. Respondent added his internet posting pictures of me without having my permission and photos featuring dogs tranquilizers and dozens of dead dogs. I do not know where and when those photos were taken. Reacting to public provocation exerted by the defendant, the undersigned home I started to get stuck on the outer envelopes of photographs depicting dead dogs. These photos were downloaded from the website that the defendant has posted these photos. Also in response to posts by defendant, insulting, libelous and inciting violence against my person are eloquent comments made by readers (…) comments expressing hatred and exhortations to violence im my person (…) end Barbulescu’s complaint is- the right apotheosis (quote): „All this negative campaign and mocking the dignity and image of my person was the subject of discussions between friends, colleagues and my knowledge. I was hit right to honest picture in Brasov after 21 years of serving the public. „Innocent as any unproven criminal offenders suffocated in this little country unproven Barbulescu Flavius ​​Dumitru have told a story between the lines are dumb but bucolic, a boliwoodian iz story „based on” begging sympathy, empathy, compassion and a lack of work and undeserved stain coins („helping hand that does not tell a story, not receiving alms” e crook crux of „Charity”). The story goes like this: Barbulescu, an honest officer, head of household, citizen and friend honestly and with fear of God, lover of people, animals, nature, landscapes, culture and justice that toils still at high school in Brasov exterminating service dogs, is attacked suddenly and without any reason a beast of an NGO who mocks him, we advertise all state institutions, and it defiles (internet) immaculate image on a gate in Brasov souls as an icon . Convinced of his innocence body, spiritual, ontological, poor man stand stoically inquisitorial investigations of the authorities ‘appropriate’ led or influenced by his friends (Dorin Valter Enache from DSVSA Brasov Brasov Mircea Popa by the police) and let the scourge of about 7 pictures of dead dogs (who „does not know where they are made”) on one hand „criminal”, „calomniatare”, „inflammatory” and places them in the mail „so that the whole neighborhood to see them.” The idea was stretched mailbox dipping them into her a few pictures of dead dogs prevents the poor man to be sleeping peacefully (as managed to sleep after ordering the killing „dead dog in the pictures” in the customary miserable Stupini) and cut them for about two weeks lust for life (what life is that the killing or starving to death a dog not ever cause any satisfaction?). Two years after posting on the Internet of texts that have violated the honor of Virginia and subjected him to suffering „atrocious” described above, after authorities ‘appropriate’ public proclaim her innocence absolute „victim” Barbulescu Flavius ​​Dumitru respectfully addresses , cuvincios and greasy civil court demanding compensation for „injury”. reader and a poor man in spirit relative to „brand” our country is preparing for amnesty collective and institutional sorcovirea offenders (using the new Penal Code and other laws as harmful) pound Brasov story may seem as touching as the story The Little Match Girl. In fact the man did not rape, robbery and did not even commit any of the other two offenses to which some prosecutors Brasov reduced Penal Code after wandering in the fog of the perpetrator proper „side objective” and „subjective side”. Or, in such conditions, why would the picture a dog catcher „martyr” and why would claim the guts „dogcatcher martyrs” damages 2 times higher than those incurred by a political prisoner 10 years at Canal? readers serious people, but the complaint „pound oppressed” reminiscent of Baron Munchausen false stories. Only a pathological liar in the race of Munchausen’s, could sustain with such ingenuity that:
         In a country under the heel of the local barons, „the head of a public service (as Barbulescu) and pupil of a local baron (Scripcaru) is” abused „no reason for a ong-ist bad!
         In a country where the heads cut off and hanged the chief dog catcher Barbulescu is innocent as a lamb, was not involved in and knew nothing about the miserable treatment of the animal in you patronize cocina (perhaps as subordinate pound committing atrocities on sustache , from protecting his boss giving him fake information and images about the wealth and welfare of shelter dogs HitPark, pictures and videos of luxury shelters in Germany and the Netherlands);
         In a city where the police chief of the municipality (Mircea Popa) and director DSVSA (Enache Dorin) boss fight belly pound service and trembling in the shadow of City Hall Mayor bodies ‘appropriate’ run by Mircea Enache Dorin Popa and Valter are controlled „right” and „sense of responsibility” cocina hinghereasca the hall (and obviously did not find any crap);
         Given that the suffering of thousands of dogs who have perished in Stupini not ripped even a hiccup, chief dog catcher was hit directly in the hypothalamus grilled two texts published on the internet and 7 pictures of dogs killed even the order of ;
        A court saying the facts that Barbulescu was accused but not sanctioned criminal contravention established fact, in absolute „innocence” decretandu pound it jainist.Pentru someone untainted as a levelheaded, the truth behind gogomaniilor pound chief force required records. So if something bothered by Barbulescu complaints and my texts to upset their truth. Upset that expose him, leaving him in the ass as the king in the story and it’s freaking out the bottleneck business bodies of dogs. And if he „suffered” as support when it did because of the withdrawal came because he could not grind dogs suffered „relaxed” playing of the „Animal Police” militated Scripcaru with Mihai Barbu ATANASOAEI and for casapirea all dogs, grinning and teasing released Cristina Lapis with sketches stupid (like „You have heard that the new law can kill dogs sick, old and aggressive?” „Yes but to others what you do Barbulescu sir? „” What else, Mrs. Cristina? „). For someone who thinks and does not chew, it is clear that:
        In Romania no ong-ist could not do body figure repression harassing a public servant honestly.
         Barbulescu know and control everything that happens in Hruba from Stupini the head, nose, godson, mom, dad and baby all evils out there.
        Organs status, ie police and DSVSA have swept under the carpet hingheresti shit, constantly sabotaging law enforcement.
        Barbulescu not suffered any texts would suffer as a sheep pluck a thistle which is tail.
        The court not only confirmed his innocence pound decreed (against a rich jurisprudence, official interpretations and logic ANSVSA’s sense) that animal cruelty by accusing Barbulescu but not sanctioned criminal contravention (offense and obviously was prescribed). And if you ask someone who is mobile that masquerades in the figure Barbulescu make sacrificial victim, assisted by a lawyer who’s coming like a glove or a cioarap (and which I highly recommend to all Ruman struggled a dog or cat which had escaped after prosecutors want to ban them neighbors to show finger), the answer is simple as can be: In February 2013, when under pressure without our The previous DSV applied sanctions pound service and found „non-conformities” (which until then had been unable to find for Vladila Inspector Constantin be blind hen and whiteness epizootic consciousness), Barbulescu Enache was advised by Valter Dorin (Director DSVSA Brasov), and to break the encirclement, they gave both suing a perfect tandem partner as two synchronized swimming in troubled waters and mocirloase.Pohta what it pohtesc two ipochimeni by this bold move is a ” super immunity „. Encouraged by the small „immunities” (the offense) received from prosecutors and the criminal court in about 3 files (after all, it would be unusual for prosecutors Romans to condemn a dog catcher because he struggled some dogs when I was in able to condemn anyone for the 1000 deaths of the Revolution!), Barbulescu dare more and begs civil court to establish censorship regarding „Nobel” of the person and fist in the mouth of those who describe a realistic manner shit they committed. Copyright on „dignity, honor and image” chief dog catcher is expected to fully recover tarcovnicilor of media propaganda machine of the City and those „components” of personality chief dog catcher would be „washed” conscientious trio Dan Ghita, Daniel Giurma or Vifor Rotar, just like washing a pair of dirty underwear in a performance car that develops at least 2000 revolutions per minut.Vineri January 24, 2014 in Brasov Court, Room J3, around 12 occurs hearing the parties and witnesses in the „historic” the first dog catcher in the world defend their „honor” unconscionable actions against NGOs. From the applicant will present as a witness even head „harmed” the DSV’s director Valter Dorin Enache (which the same „sanitation” which endorsed professional years in a row from insanitary dump Stupini gogomaniile will approve the chief complaint pound). On this occasion, the public will be in a festive officially as „honorable” Flavius ​​Barbulescu plaintiff and „venerable” witness Enache Dorin Valter prosecution in case no. 62/P/2012 the Prosecutor’s Office of Court Gyergyószentmiklós for committing offenses „cruelty to animals, forgery and negligence in service (it will crumble and one of his secrets Polichinelle namely that Flavius ​​Barbulescu shamelessly lied when when he said that all our penal denunciations were completed with traditional NUP)

     

    http://portal.just.ro/197/SitePages/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=19700000000186286&id_inst=197

    P. S.

          Regarding „honor, dignity and image” Jean Jacques Rousseau that the dog track (which the complaint will want to show that every dog ​​catcher is born pure and spotless but killing dogs NGOs „corrupts”) it accurately reflects the images and movies below, which does not need any comment

  • sharon 23/01/2014 la 3:11 pm

    PLEASE TELL ME WHY ARE YOU SO CRUEL WHY YOU DO THIS I DONT UNDERSTAND YOU YOUR NOT NICE PEOPLE YOUR NOT GODS PEOPLE YOU ARE THE DEVILS OWN WHEN YOUR TIME COMES IN LIFE YOU WILL NOT BE WITH GOD YOU WILL BE WHERE YOU BELONG WITH THE DEVIL YOULL SEE …KARMA……..

  • Haze 23/01/2014 la 3:14 pm

    Jegu asta imputit merita paralizat pe viata, la fel si cu toti ” oamenii ” de speta lui.

  • Sabine off-rapp 23/01/2014 la 6:21 pm

    STOPP!!!!!!!!!

  • luci_teremoto@yahoo.es 23/01/2014 la 7:45 pm

    Sa arda in focul iadului cine a fost in stare sa omoare acele suflete nevinovate!

  • Inge Bichlach 23/01/2014 la 7:50 pm

    Raus aus er EU und den Tieren muss geholfen werden

  • astrid pilat 23/01/2014 la 8:18 pm

    OH MEIN GOTT!!!!WAS TUT IHR DIESEN ARMEN UNSCHULDIGEN TIEREN AN?????

  • Stefanie Broichhausen 23/01/2014 la 9:24 pm

    salut,

    nu am inteles tot pt ca nu vorbesc asa bine romaneste…. vorbesti ingles ? Am inteles bine ca judecata a sis ca el e vinovat de tot asta ?..si daca e vinovat… ce mai se face, ce poate sa face akum?

    salutari
    Stefanie

  • monika mccomb 23/01/2014 la 9:45 pm

    the conditions of the animals need to be investigated by the goverment. people need to be prosecuted for doing crime to the animals , animals have rights so do people. I the animals loose all their rights to be treated failry human rights are in jeopardy as well

  • Angela Wiedenhoeft 23/01/2014 la 10:34 pm

    Es ist so Traurig das es soetwas noch in der heutigen Zeit gibt .Es macht mich sehr Wütend ,und Fassungslos ich bekomme von solchen Bildern Schlaflose Nächte. Und viele meiner Bekannte auch wir Lieben unsere Tiere und sind für Sie da bis zum letzten Atemzug ,Medikamente egal was es kostet Hauptsache mein Tier gehts wieder ganz sdchnell gut.Diese Tiere die dort langen hätten auch so ein schönes Leben verdient Sie haben alle so ein schönes Kuschliges Fell das man Knuddeln und Streicheln möchte statt dessen liegen Tod auf den Boden .Sie geben einen soviel Liebe und Mitgefühl in der Zeit wo Sie an unsere Seite sind .Sie sind dankbarer als ein Mensch .Also wieso können andere Menschen egal in welchen Land diese Tiere ein wenig Respeckt gewähren es sind die Tiere von ihren Land,und lassen Sie ienfach so Sterben,Unbegreiflich es sind Gottes Geschöpfe,Sie werden unter Schnmerzen geboren,wie wir Menschen also wieso gibt es noch solche Bilder ??? Und wer hat den Spruch damals nur zuerst gesagt …Es sind nur Tiere …Der Hund ist dir in sturme Treu ,der mensch nicht mal im Winde …Diese Menschen Vesündigen sich ,wenn Sie Tiere so Respektlos behandeln ;-((( …

  • Grand Master 23/01/2014 la 11:24 pm

    Barbulescu Flavius Dumitru este un subiect al magiei inalte si va fi pedepsit crunt pentru crimele comise impotriva animalelor !

  • Required: Name 23/01/2014 la 11:48 pm

    Romania, welcom to Europe, wie wanted your political Dynasties for check up them……

  • Avia Grabow 24/01/2014 la 9:58 am

    Es ist unfassbar,daß man so mit den bsten Freund des Menschen so umgeht!

  • antonio capasso 24/01/2014 la 3:55 pm

    Mi chiedo perche’ cosi’ tanta crudelta’ nei confronti di questi poveri fratelli animali che non hanno commesso nessua colpa. Mi chiedo dove e’ Dio…………quando avvengono questi macabri riti di morte?……………..Mi chiedo perche’ proprio a loro e’ toccata questa fine cosi’ atroce e sofferente? Non ho piu’ lacrime da piangere……i miei occhi sono stanchi nel vedere in ogni istante della mia vita queste atrocita’……….Infine mi chiedo……..ma esiste un Dio? Adesso mi rivolgo a voi che avete avuto il coraggio ad essere cosi’ sadici, cosi’ barbari……..Spero vi sia riservata la stessa fine anzi…….peggio. I vostri strazi di dolore nessuno li vorra’ ascoltare e nel silenzio che vi circondera’ si fara’ vivo il fuoco che brucera’ le vostre vite dannate…….. Antonio

  • antonio capasso 24/01/2014 la 3:58 pm

    Che dire……….i nostri occhi non vogliono piu’ vedere questi orrori. Gli animali hanno e devono avere i nostri stessi diritti. Noi prima di essere uomini siamo stati animali come loro………ma tanti lo hanno dimenticato o addirittura non lo vogliono ammettere. Io dico No eutanasia…..No………..No crudelta’………No a maltrattamenti agli animali. Antonio

  • Esther Ruiz 24/01/2014 la 6:46 pm

    Hay otras soluciones, el maltrato y el exterminio de animales les convierten en un país retrógrado y salvaje. Promuevan leyes para evitar la reproducción indiscriminada, el abandono, la compra-venta de animales…. Esto es una auténtica brutalidad

  • Inesa 24/01/2014 la 7:12 pm

    What a fucking bustards,they belong to the hell for killing poor animals!i wish they will!

  • Désirée Börner-Jost 24/01/2014 la 11:03 pm

    Stop this cruely against animals. This is horrible. This is an holocaust. Animals do have a right to live without pain. They feel like humans. Stop, stop and again stop this.

  • Stefania 25/01/2014 la 5:06 pm

    Ingrozitor!!! Iar acest nemernic arata din plin ceea ce inseamna micimea sufletului omenesc.

    Poate cineva sa-mi spuna daca Asociatia Milioane de Prieteni (AMP) chiar are grija de animalele de la Stupini asa cum se lauda pe website-ul lor
    http://ampbears.ro/en/news/2-news/167-the-dogs-from-the-city-halls-shelter-are-being-cared-by-amp
    Nu de alta, dar le-am facut donatii consistente si vreau sa stiu daca intr-adevar merita….

    Multumesc!

  • Kirsten Heinzel 25/01/2014 la 7:57 pm

    Barbulesku – you are nothing else but a murder!!

  • adina 26/01/2014 la 12:28 am

    mafia maidaneza a cutomaniacilor a mutilat sute de mii de oameni.in loc sa putrezeasca in puscarii ,criminalii lui Ionut si ai altor oameni ucisi si mutilati de maidanezi umbla liberi pe strazi si pe la otv si continua sa faca noi victime

  • fred dale 26/01/2014 la 1:47 am

    what the fuck has been going on on in here ?? this is just unacceptable .

  • Cro 26/01/2014 la 2:49 pm

    Cum a decurs procesul? Pacat ca am aflat numai azi de el. As fi mers si eu, ca la circ, sa vad niste monstri, niste avortoni zombilitici in carne si oase.

  • Daba Florentina 29/01/2014 la 8:24 pm

    nu stiu ce sa mai spun , si nici sa scriu nu prea mai pot , cred ca acest animal cu nume de om , trebuie arestat, sau poate pedepsit si scos din aceasta afacere care o face cu ciini, si mai ales in mizeria aia de cladire , asta nu cred ca e normal la cap

  • jann 02/02/2014 la 9:31 pm

    warum was haben sie euch getan was seid ihr für menschen ihr werdet in der hölle schmoren

Leave a Reply: